Air America Place Message Boards: Christian Conservatives Target Seated Judges in California - Air America Place Message Boards

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Christian Conservatives Target Seated Judges in California who wants activist judges?

#1 User is offline   RitaAnn 

  • WTF???
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Staff
  • Posts: 14,144
  • Joined: 27-May 05
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:The Deep South of the Far North
  • Interests:dreams, psychology, politics

Posted 01 June 2010 - 06:55 AM

from the ARTICLE

Quote

In Iowa's June 8 primary, two Republican gubernatorial candidates have announced they favor ousting Supreme Court judges whose unanimous decision last year legalized same-sex marriage.

"An effective way in driving policy is to try to influence who is on the courts in a state, particularly the highest court, the supreme court," said Adam Skaggs, counsel for the Brennan Center. "It's cause for concern because Americans expect courts to be places where people get a fair trial."

Most of those efforts have been aimed at state supreme courts, not courts like San Diego Superior Court that rules on custody battles and crime cases.

Called "Better Courts Now," the movement was the brainchild of Don Hamer, San Diego County's late Zion Christian Fellowship pastor who campaigned locally for California's ban on gay marriage, Proposition 8, and vetted the candidates before he died of a heart attack in March.

His fellow Pastor Brian Hendry and other supporters have carried on his legacy, launching the mostly online campaign to replace the incumbent judges -- all Democrats -- with Christian conservatives.

Backers include El Cajon Gun Exchange, a store that encourages customers to fight for California's gun owners and visit the "Better Courts Now" website before voting. Pastors have vowed to spread the word. Hendry said the group had raised about $2,000 last month.

Some say it would not take much to win the traditionally low turnout race. The election usually draws fellow judges, attorneys, prosecutors and others closely following the legal community.
Lantz Lewis, who has been a judge for 20 years, said his opponent's campaign is taking judicial elections in the wrong direction.

"I have no problem with elections, but I think it really should focus on a judge's qualifications, and it's very difficult to think something good could come out of a partisan judicial election," he said.
"Better Courts Now" says it wants courts to be more accountable to the public.

0

#2 User is offline   Bird 

  • Activist
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 747
  • Joined: 02-February 08
  • Location:parts unknown
  • Interests:bowling, golf, trumpet in university of oblivion marching band

Posted 01 June 2010 - 12:16 PM

View PostRitaAnn, on 01 June 2010 - 07:55 AM, said:

from the ARTICLE

better courts now is lying. they do not want courts more accountable to the public. they want them more accountable to religionists.
0

#3 User is offline   RitaAnn 

  • WTF???
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Staff
  • Posts: 14,144
  • Joined: 27-May 05
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:The Deep South of the Far North
  • Interests:dreams, psychology, politics

Posted 01 June 2010 - 05:04 PM

They violate the constitution by demanding litmus tests. They arent' interested in defending and upholding it, they want to systematically destroy it and replace it with theocracy.
0

#4 User is offline   Bird 

  • Activist
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 747
  • Joined: 02-February 08
  • Location:parts unknown
  • Interests:bowling, golf, trumpet in university of oblivion marching band

Posted 01 June 2010 - 10:09 PM

View PostRitaAnn, on 01 June 2010 - 06:04 PM, said:

They violate the constitution by demanding litmus tests. They arent' interested in defending and upholding it, they want to systematically destroy it and replace it with theocracy.

absolutely no argument from this corner, ritaann.

'tis the usual horseshit about activist judges who are judges that make decisions that someone doesn't agree with. that it is the usual horseshit doesn't make it any less dangerous.
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users